Long, Georgina

Three-Year Overall Survival With Nivolumab Plus Relatlimab in Advanced Melanoma From RELATIVITY-047.

Abstract Nivolumab plus relatlimab demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), along with a clinically meaningful, but not statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and a numerically higher objective response rate (ORR) compared with nivolumab in the RELATIVITY-047 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03470922). We report updated descriptive efficacy and safety results from RELATIVITY-047 with a median follow-up of 33.8 months. Median PFS was 10.2 months (95% CI, 6.5 to 15.4) with nivolumab plus relatlimab and 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.5) with nivolumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.95]); median OS was 51.0 months [...]

December 13th, 2024|Comments Off on Three-Year Overall Survival With Nivolumab Plus Relatlimab in Advanced Melanoma From RELATIVITY-047.

Outcomes following long-term disease control with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced melanoma.

Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can achieve durable responses in patients with advanced melanoma, and results from clinical trials suggest cure may be possible for a subset of patients. Despite clinical trial data, little is known about the risk, character, and clinical outcome of late recurrences after ICI. This study aimed to explore the disease outcomes and survival in a cohort of patients with long-term responses to ICI. We retrospectively identified patients treated with ICI for advanced melanoma with long-term disease control, defined as not requiring a subsequent line of systemic therapy within 3 years of ICI commencement. We [...]

December 8th, 2024|Tags: , , , |Comments Off on Outcomes following long-term disease control with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced melanoma.

Tissue-Based Profiling Techniques to Achieve Precision Medicine in Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges in Melanoma.

Abstract Immunotherapies targeting the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) checkpoint receptors have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma. However, half of the treated patients do not respond to or eventually progress on standard therapies and many experience adverse events as a result of drug toxicity. The identification of accurate biomarkers of clinical outcomes are required in order to move away from the one-size-fits-all treatment approach of standard clinical practice and toward a more personalized approach to enable the administration of the optimal therapy for any given patient and further improve patient outcomes. Recent [...]

December 2nd, 2024|Comments Off on Tissue-Based Profiling Techniques to Achieve Precision Medicine in Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges in Melanoma.

Ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with melanoma brain metastases (ABC): 7-year follow-up of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study.

Abstract Background: Patients with melanoma brain metastases respond well to immunotherapy, but long-term comparative survival data are scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy of ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with melanoma brain metastases at 7 years. Methods: This open-label, randomised, phase 2 study was conducted at four sites (two research institute cancer centres and two university teaching hospitals) in Australia. Patients aged 18 years or older with active, immunotherapy-naive melanoma brain metastases and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were eligible. Asymptomatic patients with no previous brain-directed therapy were randomly assigned (5:4) using the biased-coin [...]

December 1st, 2024|Comments Off on Ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with melanoma brain metastases (ABC): 7-year follow-up of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study.

Patient and Staff Experiences of Embedding Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Distress Screening and Quality of Life Assessment, Into Routine Melanoma Care: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Abstract Objective: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly collected in melanoma research. However, they are not used to guide immediate clinical care in Australia. This study explored the views and experiences of patients with Stage III melanoma and clinic staff during implementation of an electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in melanoma (ePROMs-MEL) pilot to assess distress and quality of life. Methods: A prospective mixed-methods study in specialist melanoma clinics in Sydney, Australia between May 2021 and February 2023. Forty-two post-ePROMs implementation surveys and 17 semi-structured interviews were undertaken among patients and staff (including oncologists, melanoma nurses and clinic managers). Survey responses [...]

December 1st, 2024|Tags: , , , , , , , , |Comments Off on Patient and Staff Experiences of Embedding Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Distress Screening and Quality of Life Assessment, Into Routine Melanoma Care: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Nivolumab (NIVO) plus relatlimab (RELA) vs. NIVO in previously untreated, metastatic, or unresectable melanoma (RELATIVITY-047): 3- year overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) results.

Abstract Introduction: The fixed-dose combination (FDC) of NIVO  +  RELA demonstrated a statistically significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit compared to NIVO monotherapy in the RELATIVITY-047 study ( NCT03470922 ), a non-statistically significant increase in OS, and a numerically higher objective response rate (ORR), leading to regulatory approval of the FDC of NIVO  +  RELA. Here, we present updated descriptive analyses after 3  years of follow-up. Materials and Methods:  Patients (pts) were randomized 1:1 to receive NIVO 480  mg  +  RELA 160  mg FDC or NIVO 480  mg monotherapy every 4 weeks. PFS per RECIST v1.1 was assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR); secondary endpoints included OS and ORR per BICR. [...]

December 1st, 2024|Comments Off on Nivolumab (NIVO) plus relatlimab (RELA) vs. NIVO in previously untreated, metastatic, or unresectable melanoma (RELATIVITY-047): 3- year overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) results.

121MO Anti-IL-8 (BMS-986253) in combination with nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma: Final analysis from the randomized part 2 of the phase I/II CA027-002 study.

Abstract Background: Elevated serum IL-8 is associated with increased tumour burden, immunotherapy resistance, and poor outcomes in many solid tumour types. Low IL-8 correlates with improved response to checkpoint inhibitors. Anti–IL-8 (BMS-986253) is a fully human IgG1κ mAb. Anti–IL-8 +/– NIVO demonstrated tolerability in pts with selected advanced cancers. Here, we report the final analysis from part 2 of CA027-002, a randomized phase 2 study of anti–IL-8 + NIVO + IPI vs placebo (PBO) + NIVO + IPI in pts with advanced melanoma resistant to PD-(L)1 blockade. Methods:  Pts with unresectable, stage III/IV melanoma who had progressed on/after anti–PD-(L)1 [...]

December 1st, 2024|Comments Off on 121MO Anti-IL-8 (BMS-986253) in combination with nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma: Final analysis from the randomized part 2 of the phase I/II CA027-002 study.

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab + relatlimab (NIVO+RELA) versus nivolumab + ipilimuab (NIVO+IPI) in the first-line (1L) treatment of advanced melanoma: updated data from an indirect treatment comparison.

Abstract Introduction An indirect comparison between NIVO  +  RELA and NIVO  +  IPI, 2 approved immunotherapy combination treatment options for patients with advanced melanoma, was previously conducted using individual patient data from the pivotal RELATIVITY-047 (RELA-047; NIVO  +  RELA vs. NIVO) and CheckMate 067 (CM-067; NIVO  +  IPI or NIVO vs. IPI) clinical trials. Here, we present the results obtained from the updated 3-year data from the RELA-047 trial. Materials and methods Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for imbalances between patient baseline characteristics across the 2 trials. Database freezes were selected to best align follow-up duration in RELA-047 (median 34 months) and CM-067 [...]

December 1st, 2024|Comments Off on Efficacy and safety of nivolumab + relatlimab (NIVO+RELA) versus nivolumab + ipilimuab (NIVO+IPI) in the first-line (1L) treatment of advanced melanoma: updated data from an indirect treatment comparison.

Nivolumab vs. Placebo in the Adjuvant Treatment of Patients with Stage IIB/C Melanoma: 3-Year Results of the CheckMate 76K (CM 76K) Study.

Abstract Introduction Patients (pts) with resected stage IIB/C melanoma have a high risk of recurrence, similar to that of pts with resected stage IIIB melanoma. The CM 76K trial ( NCT04099251 ) demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of recurrence or death with nivolumab (NIVO) compared with placebo (PBO) in pts with stage IIB/C melanoma who underwent complete resection. Updated data with 3 years of follow-up are presented here. Materials and methods Pts aged  ≥  12 years without evidence of residual disease after resection were stratified according to T category and randomized 2:1 to receive NIVO IV 480  mg or PBO every 4 [...]

December 1st, 2024|Comments Off on Nivolumab vs. Placebo in the Adjuvant Treatment of Patients with Stage IIB/C Melanoma: 3-Year Results of the CheckMate 76K (CM 76K) Study.

Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma

Abstract Purpose: In the phase III CheckMate 067 trial, durable clinical benefit was demonstrated previously with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab. Here, we report 6.5-year efficacy and safety outcomes. Patients and methods: Patients with previously untreated unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses) followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 314), nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 316), or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses; n = 315). Coprimary [...]

November 21st, 2024|Comments Off on Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma
Go to Top