Long, Georgina

1943P Updated pan-tumor guidelines for neoadjuvant scoring of pathologic response: A joint SITC and INMC effort

Background Practice-changing clinical trials have recently been reported for multiple tumor types, bringing neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), particularly immunotherapy, to the forefront for patients with surgically resectable disease. Many of these studies used legacy systems to assess pathologic response for patients receiving chemotherapy or scoring systems designed a priori. The goal of this effort is to update, harmonize, and when possible, standardize the emerging system(s) for pathologic response assessment. Methods We developed revised guidelines for assessing pathologic response to NAT (immunotherapy, targeted therapy, chemotherapy, and combinations), based on correlating histologic features with patient outcomes. Members of the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium [...]

September 24th, 2024|Comments Off on 1943P Updated pan-tumor guidelines for neoadjuvant scoring of pathologic response: A joint SITC and INMC effort

1088P Molecular profiling and matched targeted therapy for patients with advanced melanoma: Results from part I of the MatchMEL study

Background While the molecular landscape of melanoma (Mel) has been defined, the clinicopathological associations of pts with BRAF/NRAS wild-type (WT) Mel and immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment outcomes are less well understood. The MatchMEL study investigated the mutational profile of WT Mel and examined whether targeted treatments could be matched to specific molecular alterations with clinical efficacy. Methods In Part 1, consecutive pts with newly diagnosed advanced Mel presenting to two centres in Australia were enrolled. WT pts underwent FoundationOneCDx® (CDx) sequencing. Clinicopathologic features and ICI outcomes were examined. A molecular tumor board analysed CDx results to match targeted therapy [...]

September 24th, 2024|Comments Off on 1088P Molecular profiling and matched targeted therapy for patients with advanced melanoma: Results from part I of the MatchMEL study

Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: 10-year follow-up of the phase III KEYNOTE-006 study.

Abstract Background: Pembrolizumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus ipilimumab for unresectable advanced melanoma in KEYNOTE-006 (NCT01866319); 10-year follow-up data are presented. Patients and methods: Patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg i.v. every 2 weeks or every 3 weeks for ≤2 years (pooled), or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks for four cycles. After KEYNOTE-006, patients could transition to KEYNOTE-587 (NCT03486873) for long-term follow-up. Eligible patients could receive second-course pembrolizumab. The primary endpoint was OS; modified progression-free survival (PFS; censored at date last known alive), modified PFS on second-course pembrolizumab, [...]

September 15th, 2024|Comments Off on Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: 10-year follow-up of the phase III KEYNOTE-006 study.

Final, 10-Year Outcomes with Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

Abstract Background: Previous results from this trial showed longer overall survival after treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or with nivolumab monotherapy than with ipilimumab monotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma. Given that patients with advanced melanoma are living longer than 7.5 years, longer-term data were needed to address new clinically relevant questions. Methods: We randomly assigned patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to one of the following regimens: nivolumab (1 mg per kilogram of body weight) plus ipilimumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 2 [...]

September 15th, 2024|Comments Off on Final, 10-Year Outcomes with Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: 10-year follow-up of the phase III KEYNOTE-006 study

Abstract Background: Pembrolizumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus ipilimumab for unresectable advanced melanoma in KEYNOTE-006 (NCT01866319); 10-year follow-up data are presented. Patients and methods: Patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg i.v. every 2 weeks or every 3 weeks for ≤2 years (pooled), or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks for four cycles. After KEYNOTE-006, patients could transition to KEYNOTE-587 (NCT03486873) for long-term follow-up. Eligible patients could receive second-course pembrolizumab. The primary endpoint was OS; modified progression-free survival (PFS; censored at date last known alive), modified PFS on second-course pembrolizumab, [...]

September 15th, 2024|Tags: , , , , |Comments Off on Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: 10-year follow-up of the phase III KEYNOTE-006 study

Comparison of clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes for cutaneous melanomas of the head and neck and melanomas arising at other sites: Implications for systemic therapy.

Abstract Background: Melanoma is increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous disease, with conflicting evidence regarding whether cutaneous head and neck melanoma (CHNM) represents a distinct entity. Objective: Comparison of clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes of CHNM and cutaneous melanomas of other sites (CMOS). Methods: Patients with CHNM and CMOS diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 were included. Locoregional control, distant metastasis-free survival, melanoma-specific survival (MSS), and overall survival (OS) were described using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analyses were performed to examine associations between prognostic factors and outcomes. Additional analyses of survival from time of stage IV disease diagnosis were undertaken, stratified by receipt [...]

September 5th, 2024|Comments Off on Comparison of clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes for cutaneous melanomas of the head and neck and melanomas arising at other sites: Implications for systemic therapy.

Efficacy of anti PD-1 therapy in children and adolescent melanoma patients (MELCAYA study)

Abstract Background: Data on the efficacy and safety of anti PD-1 antibodies in children and adolescents (CA) with melanoma are lacking. The aim of this study was to determine outcomes of CA melanoma patients receiving anti PD-1 antibodies. Methods: Melanoma patients ≤18 years treated with anti PD-1 were retrospectively retrieved from 15 academic centers. Information on histopathological diagnosis, surgical treatment, systemic therapy, objective response rate (ORR), safety profile was collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Between April 2016 and March 2024, 99 patients treated with systemic therapy were retrieved, 81 treated with anti PD-1 [...]

September 3rd, 2024|Tags: , , , , , |Comments Off on Efficacy of anti PD-1 therapy in children and adolescent melanoma patients (MELCAYA study)
Go to Top