Pathological response calculation assessment remains accurate with reduced tumor bed examination after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in clinically detectable stage III melanoma.

Rawson RV, Maher NG, Menzies AM, Lo SN, Mesbah Ardakani N, Jackett LA, Vergara IA, Pennington TE, Shannon KF, Ch’ng S, Gonzalez M, Burton EM, Lucas MW, Reijers ILM, Rozeman EA, Gyorki DE, Sandhu S, Carlino MS, Howle J, Khattak M, Van der Westhuizen A, Andrews MC, Atkinson V, van Akkooi ACJ, Spillane AJ, Saw RPM, van de Wiel BA, Blank CU, Long GV, Tetzlaff MT, Scolyer RA. Ann Oncol. 2026 Feb;37(2):206-216. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2025.10.1237. PMID: 41183783. TOP 1%

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy produces event-free survival advantage over adjuvant therapy for patients with surgically resectable macroscopic stage IIIB/C/D melanoma. Pathological response, determined as percentage residual viable tumor (% RVT), provides critical prognostic information and informs management decisions. Here, we assessed accuracy of %RVT calculation when reduced tumor bed (TB) was examined and leverage these results proposing streamlined protocols for pathological examination.

Patients and methods: Comprehensive histopathological examination was carried out on 134 patient specimens after neoadjuvant immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab. Impact on %RVT when evaluating less TB than recommended by the initial International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium (INMC) protocol was assessed. Firstly, % RVT of each case was recalculated using seven modified protocols and compared with % RVT obtained under INMC protocol. Next, a simulation study was carried out recalculating % RVT by random sampling 50%, 33%, and 25% of TB slides per specimen.

Results: There was excellent accuracy in %RVT (R2 > 0.97) for all the modified protocols and >90% accuracy in five protocols. Accuracy of major pathological response (MPR)/non-MPR and pathological response category classification was ≥96% in six protocols. The decrease in average slides examined per specimen ranged from 9% to 58%. In total, 85%, 79%, and 74% of simulations recalculating %RVT were within 5% of the INMC calculation when 50%, 33%, and 25% of TB slides were examined, respectively. If TB slide examination is capped at 20, %RVT calculation remains 93% accurate.

Conclusions: TB embedded for histopathological examination in neoadjuvant stage IIIB/C/D melanoma specimens can be reduced without significantly compromising accuracy of %RVT calculation. We recommend an updated pathological assessment protocol: lymph nodes ≤3 cm examined in entirety; macroscopically involved lymph nodes >3 cm should have a modified examination protocol of at least a full cross-sectional transverse slice. Capping TB slides examined at 20 appears reasonable. This refined approach results in high accuracy and significant reduction in the slides examined.

Keywords: melanoma; neoadjuvant; pathological response; tumor bed.